Thread:Ender01/@comment-27407250-20171218193914

Let me preface this by stating I have no issue with a large edit spree to go fix up minor stuff on articles or make minor improvements to pages. However, those edits must be fairly undeniable improvements of some kind. Your recent edit spree was not the kind I mentioned above. In fact, when looking at the bytes on each page, you only removed from pages. (I understand that often times removing useless content does improve a page. But when all your edits are removing content it really suggests a lack of time dedicated to the edits.)

What I think is worse though is the fact that your edits, in some cases, actually made the pages worse.

Take, for example, your edit to the birch wood page. All you did was break two of the links on the page! I shouldn't have to rollback edits made by admins on the wiki. You did this on several pages, includinglava wood.

And I can see what you were trying to do with these edits, you were trying to make the links lower case. You broke numerous pages because you wanted to make a formatting style change which doesn't match the rest of the site. I honestly wouldn't be this annoyed if it wasn't for the fact that I trusted you to be an admin on the site.

I think the really ironic part about this whole situation is that, midway through your edit rampage, you decided to leavethis lovely message on Sonnenly's wall.

Now, if you check the Content Guidelines or even the community guidelines you will see that we have never made any such expectations. You need to understand when it is appropriate to act as an admin here on the wiki-giving direction and helping users out. But there are also times where your opinions are just that, opinions. You don't get to make up rules and try to enforce them.

Anyways, people make mistakes and I understand that, just consider this somewhat of a warning and be more careful next time. Also I'd like you make edit summaries when you decide to edit more than ten pages in an hour. 